Digital is for thousands of mediocre pix, film is for a few great hard copies. I'll stick to film for real photography! In other words film makes you think, digital makes you press the shutter when there ain't nothing to photograph.
Briefly describe the top three features that an affordable digital SLR would have to have in order for you to consider it as the camera for you.
- Log in or register to post comments
The digital SLR has to produce files to produce prints that equal those made from 35mm film. Marketing hype aside, this is (almost) true only at the very top of the line. In a few more years, lower price and better image quality will make a digital SLR a good value.
Since everything is planned in advance according to an article in the latest edition of PC Photo titled "Birth of a Digital Camera", it doesn't really matter what we photographers think because it's all based on what the camera manufacturer can afford! In the end, they call the shots - no pun intended!
Considering my film camera that cost all of $275 and still can do more and deliver better pictures than a digital, why would I want to spend that much more money. Plus, as film is upgraded I can still us it, when digital is upgraded, you are up the creek, you can't upgrade the camera so you are continuously spending money chasing after the newest thing.
1. Ability to upgrade sensor. 2. I require disposable income so that I can purchase one! 3. Availability of storage media (i.e. CD-R) in many years to come. There has yet to be one standard of storage medium that will around more than 10 years without enhancement causing one to upgrade archives and possibly corrupt files. EEPROM is the way of the future!