The Panasonic's FZ30 12X zoom produces excellent results. The IS System works great.
Please comment briefly on how you weigh these options when making a buying decision.
- Log in or register to post comments
![](/sites/all/themes/hometech/images/headicon.png)
![Wally Stokes's picture Wally Stokes's picture](https://www.stereophile.com/images/default_user_85x85.jpg)
I have an FZ20 and love the zoom and basic manual controls. It gives me the chance to learn about photography without spending lots and lots of money. As a result I'm now consdering an FZ30. I just wish Panasonic would handle the noise issue.
![Ruth Taylor's picture Ruth Taylor's picture](https://www.stereophile.com/images/default_user_85x85.jpg)
My first camera was a 10x optical zoom, I loved it. What I didnt like was the shutter lag at times when I needed faster capabilities. I enjoy my DSLR with all the control and more capabilities. My photography has definitely progressed even more since my DSLR purchase.
![Steve Jones's picture Steve Jones's picture](https://www.stereophile.com/images/default_user_85x85.jpg)
I have 2 SLR systems with multiple lenses so when it came time to go digital the choice was easy. I went with the digicam of course. Now I can spend more time making photos instead of trying to juggle lenses or wondering if I had the right lens with me to do the job. Plus I do not have to worry about dust on the image sensor.
![Joseph L Hutcherson II's picture Joseph L Hutcherson II's picture](https://www.stereophile.com/images/default_user_85x85.jpg)
I have Panasonics' FZ30 and Nikon's D100 and D1X with multiple lens. The Panasonic stays in my SUV most of the time and is used frequently. When I go out to shoot wildlife or landscapes, I carry the SLRs. I really enjoy using both types of cameras and use both alot. I will say that I updated the Panasonic from their FZ10 which I enjoyed using for several years. The update was much more economical than updating the Nikons.
![David DeHoog's picture David DeHoog's picture](https://www.stereophile.com/images/default_user_85x85.jpg)
I find that, overall, the SLR is best choice for what I need in a camera. One camera is never best suited for "every option" I carry a smaller digicam to always have camera with me. As the features increase, the options of what I can do with the smaller digicams expands. This increase in capabilities may allow me to get a shot that previously I may not have been prepared to take.
![Len Pierce's picture Len Pierce's picture](https://www.stereophile.com/images/default_user_85x85.jpg)
I use the Canon 20d and my wife uses the Canon S2 IS. I need the instantaneous (no lag) shutter and all the camera setup functions on knobs and buttons at my fingertips instead of on menus. Also for serious photography, the low noise, high resolution, high quality output from a DSLR is a must. My wife is a casual shooter and doesn't know an f-stop from a bus-stop. She shoots in auto mode all the time...the S2 IS is the perfect camera for her.
![Art Black's picture Art Black's picture](https://www.stereophile.com/images/default_user_85x85.jpg)
For my use in conjunction with travel, the freedom of an all-in-one ergonomic was a deciding factor. The cost/benefit ratio was the clincher. I'll consider an up grade from my Konica-Minolta A-2 when a manufacturer introduces a camera with a similar outstanding feature-set combined with larger photo sensors, accomplished with either fewer than 8MP or a larger sensor or a combination of both.
![Dianne Harlan's picture Dianne Harlan's picture](https://www.stereophile.com/images/default_user_85x85.jpg)
This is an important choice and probably depends more on what your pocketbook can afford. Right now I would go with the DSLR because my own past experience has not demanded long zooms. However,I can see a great use by soccer moms and dads for the 10X digicam as they follow their kids' activities. I would be particularly interested to know how the anti-shake mechanism holds up over the life of these cameras.
![Joe Dlhopolsky's picture Joe Dlhopolsky's picture](https://www.stereophile.com/images/default_user_85x85.jpg)
While I use zooms (about 4X) on my DSLR, it seems to me that 10-12X would be more of a compromise on optical quality. i.e., resolution, contrast, edge effects, etc. While I don't have a full frame DSLR, I understand that the digicams have still smaller sensors, which would also reduce resolution - all things being equal. I make my images available for publication and commercial use. I question whether digicam quality would be suitable.